ORDER: The landlord is the revision petitioner. R.C.O.P.No.172 of 1993 was filed by the petitioner herein on the ground of wilful default, change of user and for his own occupation. R.C.O.P.No.252 of 1996 was filed by the respondent for deposit of rent. The Rent Controller rejected the ground of wilful default as also change of user, but ordered eviction on the ground of own occupation. R.C.O.P.No.252 of 1996 was also dismissed. Against the orders, three appeals were filed, R.C.A.Nos.99, 100 of 1997 and 38 of 1998. The tenant filed R.C.A.Nos.99 and 100 of 1997 against the order of eviction passed on the grounds of owner’s occupation and the refusal to permit deposit of rent. The landlord has filed R.C.A.No.38 of 1998 against the rejection of the grounds of change of user and wilful default. The Appellate Authority dismissed the landlord’s appeal and also the tenant’s appeal under Sec.8(5) of the Act. R.C.A.No.99 of 1997 was allowed thereby dismissing the order of eviction. The present revision petitions C.R.P.Nos.3009 to 3011 of 1999 are filed against all these orders. The only petition that was argued was C.R.P.No.3010 of 1999 against R.C.A.No.99 of 1997. No arguments were advance

Click Here to Read the rest of this document