S.K.KRISHNAN
Rajavelu and others – Appellant
Versus
Mani and others – Respondent
2. As against the defendants 2 to 6, one Ramasamy Gounder instituted a suit for permanent injunction in respect of the suit property. On receipt of summons, the defendants appeared in the said suit and thereafter filed written statement. A written statement was filed by the 5th defendant and it was adopted by other defendants. An additional written statement was also filed by the 4th defendant and the same was adopted by the defendants 2, 3, 5 and 6.
3. During trial, the 6th defendant filed a petition under O.5, Rule 17 and Sec.151 of Civil Procedure Code praying the Court to grant leave to amend the additional written statement. A counter statement has also been filed by the 5th respondent/5th defendant in the said petition. After enquiry, learned Munsif, Tiruchengode dismissed the said petition. Challenging the said order, the present revision has been filed.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondents.
5. The only point that arise
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.