SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 1224

S.K.KRISHNAN
Rajavelu and others – Appellant
Versus
Mani and others – Respondent


Advocates:
N.Manoharan, for Petitioners.
P.Valliappan, for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, for Respondents.

ORDER: This revision petition has been filed by defendants 2 to 6 against the fair and decretal order dated 10.2.2003 made in I.A.No.193 of 2003 in O.S.No.246 of 1992 on the file of the Learned District Munsif, Tiruchengode.

2. As against the defendants 2 to 6, one Ramasamy Gounder instituted a suit for permanent injunction in respect of the suit property. On receipt of summons, the defendants appeared in the said suit and thereafter filed written statement. A written statement was filed by the 5th defendant and it was adopted by other defendants. An additional written statement was also filed by the 4th defendant and the same was adopted by the defendants 2, 3, 5 and 6.

3. During trial, the 6th defendant filed a petition under O.5, Rule 17 and Sec.151 of Civil Procedure Code praying the Court to grant leave to amend the additional written statement. A counter statement has also been filed by the 5th respondent/5th defendant in the said petition. After enquiry, learned Munsif, Tiruchengode dismissed the said petition. Challenging the said order, the present revision has been filed.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the respondents.

5. The only point that arise








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top