SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Mad) 338

A.RAMAMURTHI
Murugesan – Appellant
Versus
Karuppayee Ammal and another – Respondent


Advocates:
R.Sekar, for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, for Petitioner.
R.S.Ramanathan, for Respondents.

ORDER: Defendant in O.S. No.572 of 1997 on the file of Additional District Munsif Court, Karur, has preferred the present revision petition aggrieved against the fair and decretal order dated 30.3.2001 made in I.A. No.212 of 2000.

2. The case in brief is as follows: The defendant in the suit filed a petition under Sec.145 of the Evidence Act and under Sec.151 of Civil Procedure Code to mark the portion of the admission of the second plaintiff in O.S. No.640 of 19994 on the file of District Munsif Court, Karur and also the judgment in the suit as well as the Commissioner’s report filed in that suit.

3. The plaintiffs filed the present suit for permanent injunction. The Ist plaintiff already filed another suit in O.S. No.292 of 1998. There was already another suit in O.S. No.640 of 1994, in which the 2nd plaintiff herein ws also examined as one of the witnesses and the certified copy of the deposition given by him is now filed. He was examined as P.W.3 in that case. Even in the chief-examination, he admitted that there is a east-west kavar immediately on the north of the property i.e., S.F.No.740. Now, when the 2nd plaintiff was examined in the present case, he gave an evasive reply th

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top