V.BAKTHAVATSALU
P. Rayen – Appellant
Versus
Seyed Ali Fathima – Respondent
2. The case of the petitioner is as follows:
The petition mentioned building belongs to the petitioner. The respondent is the tenant on monthly rent of Rs.500. The respondent paid rent upto the end of December, 1990 and thereafter, he has wilfully defaulted to pay the rent inspite of repeated demands. The respondent is in arrears of rent from January, 1991 to 1992 for seventeen months to the tune of Rs.8,500. Further, the petition mentioned building is required for immediate purpose of demolition and to erect a new building on the site. The building is an old one. It requires immediate demolition. Besides, the petitioner wants to argument the income by putting up a new building. The petitioner undertake that the work of demolishing of the building will be commenced not later than one month an shall be completed before the expiry of three months from the date she recovers the possession of the entire building. Therefore, this petition is filed directing the respondent to vacat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.