K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
Udayakumar – Appellant
Versus
Superintendent of Police – Respondent
2. The petitioner along with other accused are chargesheeted by the respondent alleging that they committed the offences punishable under Secs. 5(2) read with 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Secs.109 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. Charges in the abovesaid cases were framed in the year 1989 and trials are not yet over.
3. The revision petitioner and some other accused filed petitions for closing the prosecution evidence on the ground that the time fixed by the Supreme Court for completion of the trial in accordance with principle laid down in Raj Deo Sharma v. State of Bihar, A.I.R. 1996 S.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.