M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
Y. SreelathaaliasRoja – Appellant
Versus
Mukanchand Bothra – Respondent
2. Mukanchand Bothra, the complainant, aggrieved over the inadequacy of the sentence, filed a revision before this Court in Crl.R.C.No.736 of 1999 and the same was admitted and notice was ordered on 23.7.1999.
3. On the application filed by the parties before this Court, the appeal against conviction pending before the Principal Sessions Court, Chennai, was directed to be posted before this Court for being heard along with Crl.R.C.No.736 of 1999. Accordingly, the said appeal papers were received by the Registry of this Court and the same was numbered as C.A.No.261 of 2000. Since both these matters are taken together for final disposal, they are being disposed of through this common judgment.
4. The facts of the case in short are these:
"(a) V. Sreelath
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.