M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM
Nithyanandam – Appellant
Versus
State by Inspector of Police, NIB. , CID. , Chennai – Respondent
2. The short facts leading to the conviction are as follows:
"(a) P.W.3 Kalidhasan, the Sub Inspector of Police, NIB CID received the information Ex.P-4 on 22.9.1993 at about 11.15 p.m. regarding the offenders involving in the possession of heroin at Periyamedu. He recorded the same in Ex.P-5 and sent it to P.W.5, the Inspector of Police, NIB CID. Then, he proceeded to the spot for surveillance at the junction of Naval Hospital Road and E.V.R. Periyar Road at Periyamedu. He secured the help of one Jaykumar P.W.4 to be as a witness for search.
(b) P.W.3 and Head Constable P.W. 1 along with P.W.4 were watching the movements of the offenders. At that time, i.e., on 23.9.1993 early morning, they found two persons including the appellant walking along the road. They accosted them and disclosed their identity to them. After informing their right of exercising their option with regard to the search, those persons allowed P.W.3 to search them.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.