SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 990

P.SATHASIVAM
V. Ravi Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd. and another – Respondent


Advocates:
M.Aravind Subramanian for Petitioner.
A.Babu, for Respondents.

JUDMENT: The applicant herein guarantor has filed the above application to set aside the Insolvency Notice No.76 of 2002 under Sec.9(2) of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act.

2. In the affidavit filed in support of the above application it is stated that the principal debtor M/s. TTG Industries Limited is a Public Limited Company and on account of accumulated losses, the net worth of the said principal debtor was fully eroded and therefore a reference was made under Sec.15(1) of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as “the Act”) to BIFR and the reference was registered vide No.111 of 2001. The BIFR has also initiated further proceedings under Sec.16 (2) of the Act. The respondent herein had initiated arbitration proceedings against the first debtor Company M/s. TTG Industries Limited in A.P.No.17 of 1999, claiming a sum of Rs.76,51,296 together with interest at 3 % per annum. The award was passed on 4.8.2000, directing the petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs.76,51,296 together with interest at 21% per annum from 1.12.1998, till the date of realisation.

3. It is further stated that questioning the said arbitration proceedings, an appeal wa











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top