PRABHA SRIDEVAN
Venkatachala Gounder and another – Appellant
Versus
TR. Soundaram – Respondent
2. The appellants admitted the receipt of the cheque from the third defendant and also the endorsement. But they denied that it was dishonoured on 19.2.1981. According to the appellants the respondent did not inform them of the dishonour not did she send them a written notice. The appellants did not promise payment. They in turn issued a notice to the third defendant asking him to repay the amount to the respondent. There is no contract to pay interest. The suit has to be dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.