R.JAYASIMHA BABU, E.PADMANABHAN
K. Veeramani . – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu represented by its Secretary to Government, Prohibition and another. – Respondent
2. The omitted portion reads thus:
“A copy of the petition sent by one Tmt.Udaya dated 30.11.2001 addressed to the Secretary to Government, Prohibition and Excise Department, Chennai, was also placed before me. I have gone through the contentions raised in the said petition and the relevant case records. The contentions raised by the petitioner are not correct and, hence, I am not giving much credence to the petition and felt that the same is given with ulterior motive to use the same as defence document.”
3. In the Tamil version of the order of detention with the grounds, which is
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.