ORDER: It is brought to the notice of the Court that service of notice on the respondents 1 to 3 is pending. In order to avoid the avoidable delay and in view of the fact that the available materials would be suffice to give a disposal to this revision, the following order is made.

2. This revision has arisen from the order of the learned District Munsif dismissing an interlocutory application filed by the petitioners herein seeking for the impleadment of the respondents 4 to 7 herein as parties to the proceedings in I.A.No.1022 of 1995.

3. It was a suit filed by the petitioners herein against the respondents 1 to 3 herein seeking for partition of the suit property. As could be well seen from the available materials on hand, a preliminary decree was passed in the said suit on 18.8.1995. Subsequently, final decree application in I.A.No.1022 of 1995 was filed by the plaintiffs, wherein the trial Court had appointed Mr.V. Ponnusamy, Advocate as a Commissioner to divide the suit properties into four equal shares. The said Commissioner on inspection, has filed his report. At that juncture, the instant application has been filed by the petitioners to add the respondents 4 to 7 as parties t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document