IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.D.Dinakaran, J.
Shriram Marine Harvests Ltd represented by its Secretary Rajendra Bhat
Versus
The District Registrar, Madras and another
W.P.No.9991 of 1994
Decided On : 16 July 2001
“(38) Instrument evidencing transfer of property between companies limited by shares as defined in the Companies Act, 1956, in a case where (1) at least 90 per cent of the issued share capital of the transferee company is in the beneficial ownership of the transferor company, or (ii) where the transfer takes place between a parent company and a subsidiary company one of which is the beneficial owner of not less than 90 per cent of the issued share capital of the other or (iii) where the transfer takes place between two subsidiary companies of each of which not less than 90 per cent of the share capital is in the beneficial ownership of a common parent company:
Provided that a certified copy of the relevant records of the companies kept in the office of the Registrar of Companies, Madras, is produced by the parties to the instrument to prove that the conditions above prescribed are fulfilled.”
2. As per Clause 38 of the Notification II-I No.2620 of 1964, exemption of payment of stamp duty is permissible in the case of transfer of property between companies limited by shares, as defined under the companies Act, 1956, where:
(i) atleast 90 per cent of the issued share capital of the transferee company is in the beneficial ownership of the transferor company; or
(ii) where the transfer takes place between a parent company and a subsidiary company, one of which is the beneficial owner of not less than 90 per cent of the issued share capital of the other; or
(iii) where the transfer takes place between two subsidiary companies of each of which not less than 90 per cent of the share capital is in the beneficial ownership of a common parent company.
In all these cases referred to above, what is required under law is that, both the subsidiary and parent companies should have been registered under the Companies Act, 1956, which is applicable throughout India. For seeking the benefit of Clause 38 of the notification II-I No.2620 of 1964, a certified copy of the relevant books of the companies kept in the office of the Registrar of Companies, has to be produced by the parties to the instrument.
3. In the instant case, the parent-holding company executed 119 documents in favour of the petitioner subsidiary company, namely, Document Nos.786 to 795, 808 to 822, 840 to 859, 864 to 883, 890 to 909, 916 to 935 and 937 to 950 of 1993 before the District Registrar, Madras Central. At the time of registration, the petitioner also produced a certificate issued by the Registrar of Companies at New Delhi and Haryana, certifying that the petitioner company is a wholly owned subsidiary company of Shriram Industrial Enterprises Ltd. On the basis of the said material and relevant records of the Registrar of Companies at New Delhi and Haryana, the first respondent registered the said documents, giving exemption for payment of stamp duty on production of the registration certificate.
4. However, the first respondent, again, by letter dated 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.