ORDER: The respondent in R.C.O.P. Nos.15 of 1993 and 18 of 1993 is the petitioner in these civil revision petitions. The first respondent in the C.R.P.No.3525 of 2000 filed R.C.O.P. No.15 of 1993 against the Civil Revision Petitioner before the learned Rent Controller, Villupuram for fixation of fair rent. The first respondent in the C.R.P.No.3531 of 2000 filed R.C.O.P. No.18 of 1993 for an order of eviction under Sec.10(3)(a)(ii) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent) Control Act, 1960. Pending the above petitions the civil revision petitioner sold the property in question to the respondents 2 to 7 in R.C.O.P. No.15 of 1993 on 3.3.1997. An ex parte order of eviction was passed on 5.3.1997. The first respondent filed I.A. No.37 of 2000 seeking for a direction to implead the purchasers namely the respondents 2 to 7 in the civil revision petition in R.C.O.P. under O.1, Rule 10 read with Sec.151, C.P.C. The said I.A. was allowed on 21.8.2000. The respondents in the civil revision petition also filed I.A. No.38 of 2000 under O.6, Rule 17 read with Sec.151, C.P.C. for a direction to amend the petition as set out in the petition in detail in order to determine the real controversy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document