SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 799

P.D.DINAKARAN
G. Srinivasan – Appellant
Versus
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board represented by its Chairman, Madras and others – Respondent


ORDER: Aggrieved by the proceedings dated 30.4.1994 of the second respondent rejecting the request of the petitioner for alteration of the date of birth as 26.5.1937 instead of 21.6.1936, based on the extract of the registration of date of birth enclosing along with his application dated 17.8.1993 and other evidences enclosed therewith; and the consequential refusal to permit the petitioner to continue in service till 31.5.1995, the petitioner seeks a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records of the second respondent comprised in his proceedings in Memo. (Permanent) No.085263/671/C2-2/93-2, dated 30.4.1994, quash the said proceedings and consequently, restrain the respondents from in any way interfering with the rights of the petitioner to continue in service till 31.5.1995.

2.1. According to Mr.M. Venkatachalapathy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner, the alteration of date of birth of the petitioner, as referred to above, is specifically governed by Regulation 110 of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board Service Regulations (hereinafter referred to as "Service Regulations), which is amended by Board’s proceedings dated 13.8.1993.

2.2. Referring to R




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top