SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Mad) 1104

V.KANAGARAJ
Arthanari and another – Appellant
Versus
S. Seshagiri Rao and others – Respondent


Advocates:
R.Subramaniam, for Petitioners.
T.R.Rajaraman, for Respondents.

ORDER: This civil revision petition is directed against the fair and decretal order dated 28.6.2001 made in R.E.A.No.34 of 2001 in R.E.A.No.15 of 2001 in R.E.P.No.107 of 1995 in O.S.No.178 of 1997 by the Court of District Munsif, Dharmapuri, thereby dismissing the application filed by the petitioners herein under O.21, Rule 11, C.P.C. praying for the delivery of possession of the petition mentioned properties, as per the procedures established under O.21, Rules 22 and Sec.35, C.P.C.

2. After all, it is an application filed under Sec.148, C.P.C. before the Court below seeking an extension of time from 28.3.2001 for the payment of the cost of Rs.100 as ordered by the Court below, for the Court to send for certain documents, thus conditionally allowing the said application in R.E.A.No.15 of 2001 and the said amount since should have been paid on or before 28.3.2001 as per the order passed by the Court below, had not been able to be paid by the petitioner and hence, seeking extension of time, he had filed the above application the very next day that was on 29.3.2001, assigning reasons that he had contacted his lawyer on 16.3.2001 to know about the stage of the orders in the above R.E.A











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top