SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 929

K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM
Sudha – Appellant
Versus
Vaidyanathan – Respondent


Advocates:
A.Muthukumar, for Petitioner.
Srinath Sridevan, for Respondent.

ORDER: In the above Transfer C.M.P the petitioner seeks for a transfer of H.M.O.P.No.4 of 2000 on the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram to the Court of Additional District Judge, Karaikal, for trial.

2. According to the petitioner, she was married to the respondent on 9.11.1997 at Karaikal. She was presented by her father with 22 sovereigns of gold, silver vessels worth about Rs.12,000, stainless steel worth about Rs.3,000 among other things. The marriage was also performed on grand scale by spending about 2.5 lakhs. Thereafter, they were living together at Chidambaram, where the respondent was employed. Ever since the marriage the respondent was not treating the petitioner properly and she was kept like a slave and even her parents were not allowed to meet her. Her entire salary was taken by the respondent and she was not given anything even for her personal expenses. She had to resign the job at Chidambaram and got herself employed as staff nurse at Karaikal since her living with the respondent was impossible. She filed M.O.P.No.3 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikal for judicial separation. A counter was filed by the respondent and on med



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top