K.GNANAPRAKASAM
Rakku – Appellant
Versus
Cooriyayee and another – Respondent
2. The first respondent/ plaintiff filed the suit for declaration and injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession and enjoyment of the suit properties. The plaintiff contended that she was the only daughter of Coori Konar and thereby become entitled to the suit properties. But the appellant/ first defendant herein contended that she is entitled to the entire item 1 and half share in items 2 to 5 of the suit properties, being the daughter of the same mother Rakkayee Ammal through Sathappan. The appellant herein relied upon a Will dated 10.1.1958 marked as Ex.B-1. Though the Will was exhibited and marked without any objection, it was not duly proved by the defendant about the execution and attestation of B-1. Though the Will is a registered document, the due execution, attestation and registration of the three different acts, one follows the other. Sec.68 of the Evide
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.