S.S.SUBRAMANI
L. Varadarajan and others – Appellant
Versus
Thomas and others – Respondent
2. Petitioners are plaintiffs in O.S.No.686 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif’s Court at Tuticorin. Their suit was decreed as per decree and judgment dated 12.10.1999. Respondents herein without filing a copy of the certified decree, filed an appeal before the District Judge, Tuticorin, along with an application I.A.No.405 of 1999, praying to dispense with the production of certified copy of the decree for the present. In the affidavit in support of that application, it was stated by the respondent that though they have applied for the certified copy of the decree emergently on 13.10.1999 itself, the same has not been issued and if they are to wait till certified copy of decree is obtained, their rights will be prejudiced and they may be permitted to file appeal without the copy of the decree and they undertook to produce the same as and when it is prepared. The District Judge, as per order dated 15.10.1999, dispensed with the production of certified copy of decree of the trial
Shakuntala Devi v. Kuntal Kumari A.I.R. 1969 S.C. 575
Shri Jogdhayan v. Babu Ram [1983] 1 S.C.C. 26
Jagat Dhish Bhargava v. Jawaharlal Bharagava A.I.R. 1961 S.C 832
A. S. Subbaraj v. M. Muthiah : [1953] 2 M.L.J. 577
Balakrishna Industrial Works v. Venkatachari A.I.R. 1954 Mad. 883
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.