SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 1098

M.CHOCKALINGAM
Ramaswamy and another – Appellant
Versus
R. Murugan – Respondent


Advocates:
R.Subramanian, for appellants.
S.M.Subramaniam, for Respondent.

ORDER: This second appeal is preferred from the judgment and decree rendered by the learned II Additional District Court’s Incharge Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Krishnagiri dated 17.3.1998 made in A.S.No.36 of 1996, confirming the judgment and decree dated 12.3.1996 made by the District Munsif, Uthangarai in O.S.No.340 of 1995.

2. The plaintiffs are the appellants herein.

3. The appellants herein filed a suit for declaration of title and consequential permanent injunction with the following averments: The second plaintiff/ second appellant is the fourth wife of the first plaintiff/ first appellant. The respondent is the son of the first appellant through his second wife Shyamala. The first appellant purchased 3 acres and 87 cents in Survey No.21/1 Ranadathampatti. The plaint schedule mentioned 7 acres and 31 cents is situated in S.No.21/1 Ranadathampatti. Out of the said 7 acres and 31 cents, the first appellant purchased 3 acres and 87 cents under another sale deed dated 9.1.1978. The second appellant purchased the remaining 13 cents under a sale deed dated 25.8.1975. Thus the plaint schedule landed property totalling 11 acres and 31 cents exclusively belonged to the appella



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top