SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 1081

V.KANAGARAJ
Muthamilselvan and others – Appellant
Versus
A. Manickam and others – Respondent


Advocates:
M.V. Venkataseshan, Advocate for Petitioners. K. Srinivasan, Advocate for
Respondents.

Judgment :-

1. This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India praying to set aside the judgment and decree dated 14. 2004 rendered in O.S.No. 144 of 2003 by the Court of District Munsif, Melur.

2. Tracing the history of the above Civil Revision Petition coming to be filed by the defendants in the suit, it comes to be known that the respondents herein have filed the suit in O.S.No.144 of 2003 on the file of the Court of District Munsif, Melur for declaration of their right to enjoy the benefits of the honour in the temple of Sri Periyapanaiyur Ayyanar, Attapatti by rotation and for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from in any manner interfering with the rights of the plaintiffs. It further comes to be seen that during the course of trial, the defendants have filed a petition in I.A.No.426 of 2004 under Order 14, Rule 5 and Section 151, C.P.C. praying to frame an additional issue relating to the jurisdiction of the trial Court to try the suits in respect of Honours in the temple and the trial Court having conducted a thorough trial into the matter, wherein on behalf of the plaintiffs four witnesses would be examined for ora




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top