SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 30

K.SAMPATH
Ameena Beebi alias Jamurthu Begum – Appellant
Versus
P. M. Khaja Mohideen – Respondent


Judgment :

The landlady is the revision petitioner. She sought eviction of the respondent under Secs.10(3)(a)(i) and 10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960 as amended by Act 23 of 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) in R.C.O.P.No.252 of 1987 on the file of the Rent Controller (District Munsif), Tiruchirappalli.

2. The case of the landlady as set out on the petition was as follows:

The respondent is a tenant in respect of the front portion of the building, namely door No.4, Paathakadai Lane, Chinna Chowk, Tiruchirapalli, consisting of two rooms, kitchen and bath room on a monthly rent of Rs.150 payable on or before 5th of every succeeding month. She is a gosha woman living in a rented building. She has three grown up daughters. She requires the entire building including the portion in the occupation of the respondent bona fide for her own occupation. She has already got one of the tenants S.S.Raj vacated and that portion is remaining vacant. She is not able to occupy the property as it is impossible to use the property without getting the other portion also vacated. She has already obtained eviction through Court against one Hanifa and at






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top