S.S.SUBRAMANI
Allahabad Bank represented by its Branch Manager, Coimbatore – Appellant
Versus
E. Theivanai – Respondent
1. Tenant in R.C.O.P.No.267 of 1992 on the file of Rent Controller, Coimbatore, is the revision petitioner.
2. Parties herein will be referred to as landlord and tenant for the sake of convenience.
3. Tenant in this case is a Nationalised Bank. Schedule premises was taken by the Institution for the purpose of residence of its Manager
4. Theentire building consists of ground floor and three other floors. The ground floor is occupied by the tenant, where it is having its Branch Office. The schedule premises is also let out to the tenant under separate rental arrangement for being used as residential quarters of its Manager. Landlord alleged that marriage of his grown up son was fixed in 1990 and this fact was informed to the tenant. An additional space was required by the landlord and the tenant was asked to vacate from the scheduled premises. There is no favourable response and the landlord issued a registered notice on 30.7.1991, asking the tenant to vacate the premises. In that notice, the tenant was informed that the marriage is also fixed and they are in urgent need of additional space. Another notice was issued on 5. 1992, asking the tenant to vacate the premises,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.