P. Sathasivam, J.

Aggrieved by the order of the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.995, Public (Spe-cial-A) Department, dated 19. 1996 dismissing him from service, the petitioner has filed the above writ petition to quash the same on various grounds.

.2. The case of the petitioner is briefly stated hereunder: According to him, he was directly appointed as District and Sessions Judge Grade-II under G.O.Ms.No.1129, dated 27. 1987. After completion of probation and training, he was posted as First Additional District and Sessions Judge at Tirunelveli on 11. 1989. While he was working as First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli, he disposed off a Civil Appeal in A.S.No.40 of 1988 and a Sessions case in S.C.No.105 of 1987 among other civil appeals and other sessions cases. Aggrieved by his judgment in A.S.No.40 of 1988, one Kunammal lodged a complaint against him as if he demanded a bribe of Rs. 15,000 to render a favourable judgment and since she did not pay the said sum, he dismissed her appeal. Likewise being aggrieved by his judgment and sentence, one of the accused in S.C.No.105 of 1.987, namely, Laser made a complaint that as if he demanded a sum of Rs.25,00