SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 153

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Dr. Ravichander – Appellant
Versus
Karunakaran and others – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Yashod Vardhan, for Petitioner. Ms. K. Sumathi, for Respondents.

Judgment :

These revision petitions are filed by plaintiff in O.S.No.32 of 1997 on the file of Sub court, Cuddalore.

2. These revision petition arise under the following circumstances:

Petitioner herein filed the suit for partition claiming 1/4th share in plaint ‘B’ schedule properties on the ground that the said item is family property. According to him, plaintiff and defendants 1 to 4 constitute a joint family. First defendant obtained about 5 1/2 acres of land from his ancestors and they were yielding good income. It is also said hat 4th defendant is also employed and first defendant is also getting good income. The income from the property was kept as surplus. Plaintiff after completing his education. is now a medical practitioner. Out of the family funds, a property was purchased at Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram. Since first defendant was the kartha of the family, the same was taken in his name. Family also purchased a Mahindra Van, though the permit is also in the name of first defendant. The Van was profitably operated and that also yielded a good income. In view of his medical practice, plaintiff did not get time to verify how the income from the property are being spent.

3.






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top