1. The respondent in the Rent Control Original Petition No.8 of 1990 is the petitioner herein and he has come forward to institute the above Civil Revision Petition against the fair and decretal Order dated 211. 1999 made in I.A.No.85 of 1996 in R.C.O.P.No.8 of 1990 passed by the Rent Controller and the I Additional District Munsif, Salem.

2. The original petitioner in the R.C.O.P. is the landlady viz., R. Amsavani Ammal who is reportedly dead. The second and third respondents herein namely, Minor Santhosh and V.Shiyamala Rani have come to be impleaded as legal representatives of the deceased petitioner R.Amsavani Ammal as per the order dated 211. 1999 made in I.A.No.85 of 1996 by the court below which is under challenge before this Court.

3. The contentions of the petitioner herein is that Minor Santhosh and V. Shiyamala Rani should not have been impleaded as legal representatives of the deceased R. Amsavani Ammal at all, since according to the revision petitioner, the rights of the deceased as claimed by her in the RCOP claiming to vacate the tenant for her own occupation being a personal right of hers has become non est in law. The lower court, refusing to accept th