SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 148

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Mohammed & Sons represented by Amtridbai – Appellant
Versus
Abbasbhai Jodhpurwala and others – Respondent


Advocates:
N. Rosi Naidu, for Petitioners. K.P. Ashok, for Respondents.

Judgment :

In all these revision petitions, tenants are the revision petitioners.

2. Landlords sought eviction of tenants on the ground that the building requires immediate demolition and reconstruction. According to landlords the building is nearly 70 years old and is in bad condition. There are several cracks all over the building in several places. Plastering are worn out and fell as powder and the building is in ruined condition. The superstructure is constructed with brick in lime and plastered in lime and country wood alone is used for wood works. Building is made of different types of roofings such as Madras terrace. Bengal terrace and A.C. sheet roofing, and it is impossible to maintain the building after repairing or by patch works here and there. It is the further case of landlords that they have got sufficient means and resources to carry out the demolition and reconstruction work. If the building project is completed, the same is beneficial and profitable to both landlord and tenants. After reconstruction, petitioners/landlords want to utilise major portion for their own use and also willing to accommodate some of the tenants for which also provisions are made in the re






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top