SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 568

A.RAMAN
M. K. Ethirajulu – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Malini – Respondent


Advocates:
R.Muralidharan, for the Petitioner.

Judgment :

1. Considering the nature of the petition, I am of the view that it is not necessary to order notice on the same to the respondents.

2. Thepetitioner herein filed an application before the Family Court to furnish him with the certified copies of the petition in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 1997, the decretal order passed in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 1997 and the judgment in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 1997.

3. It is seen that a complaint has been registered against Ethirahulu, Lakshmi Ethirajulu, Sridhar and Balaji regarding dowry demand and stoppage of marriage. The petitioner herein is thus arrayed as the first accused in the said complaint. The complainant is the father of the Rekha Malini. The complaint was with reference to the marriage proposal of the 4th accused. viz., the son of the petitioner herein with the daughter of the complainant Rekha Malini. Rekha Malini has also been cited as a witness in the said complaint. Apparently, the proceeding was initiated by Rekha Malini against Balaji, the son of the petitioner herein before the Family Court in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 1997.

4. The petitioner herein therefore applied for grant of certified copies of the petition in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 199







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top