A.RAMAN
M. K. Ethirajulu – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Malini – Respondent
1. Considering the nature of the petition, I am of the view that it is not necessary to order notice on the same to the respondents.
2. Thepetitioner herein filed an application before the Family Court to furnish him with the certified copies of the petition in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 1997, the decretal order passed in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 1997 and the judgment in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 1997.
3. It is seen that a complaint has been registered against Ethirahulu, Lakshmi Ethirajulu, Sridhar and Balaji regarding dowry demand and stoppage of marriage. The petitioner herein is thus arrayed as the first accused in the said complaint. The complainant is the father of the Rekha Malini. The complaint was with reference to the marriage proposal of the 4th accused. viz., the son of the petitioner herein with the daughter of the complainant Rekha Malini. Rekha Malini has also been cited as a witness in the said complaint. Apparently, the proceeding was initiated by Rekha Malini against Balaji, the son of the petitioner herein before the Family Court in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 1997.
4. The petitioner herein therefore applied for grant of certified copies of the petition in F.C.O.P.No.1343 of 199
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.