SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 64

K.P.SIVASUBRAMANIAM
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD – Appellant
Versus
A. SHARIFA BIVI – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties: K.S. Narasimhan, R. Balasubramanyam,
Thiagarajan Ramaswamy, Advocates.

Judgment :-

K.P. SIVASUBRAMANIAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the order of the commissioner for Workmens Compensation (Deputy Commissioner for Labour), madurai in W. C. No. 234 of 1992. The insurance company, the respondent No. 1 in the W. C. case is the appellant in the above appeal.

( 2 ) THE applicant No. 1, the wife of one lynool Yekin, has filed the saifi claim petition. According to her, her husband was working as a driver of the lorry No. TNU 3339 belonging to the respondent No. 2 in the claim petition and the said vehicle was registered with the respondent No. 1. The respondent No. 2 had instructed the deceased to park the lorry at Kalaimalar workshop for rectification of repairs and was also directed further to collect the rental dues from Jani Batcha and Rahman at goods-shed situated at West Veli Street, madurai and that accordingly, the deceased went to the workshop and after leaving the lorry he returned to the owners house to inform about the same, that he was directed at the owners house to contact the owner at Bombay Automobiles, who had gone to collect spare parts for the lorry. It is further stated that while the deceased was proceeding to Bombay Autom









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top