SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 733

A.SUBBULAKSHMY
V. Thanikachalam – Appellant
Versus
J. Radhakrishnan – Respondent


Advocates:
M.S. Mani, for Plaintiff. M.R. Murali, for Defendant.

Judgment :

1. Thetestatrix Radha Rukmini Ammal left some immovable property in the city of Madras. She lastly executed the Will dated 16. 1989 for the petitioners life and thereafter to be taken by his five sons viz., T.Rajendran, T.Ramesh, T.Kumar, T.Selvam and T.Loganathan absolutely in equal shares. The deceased did not appoint any executor under the Will and the plaintiff is the legatee under the Will. The testatrix Radha Rukmini Ammal died on 23. 1990. The amount of assets which is likely to come to the plaintiffs hands does not exceed in the aggregate a sum of Rs.65,000 and the net amount of the said assets, after deducting all items which the plaintiff is by law allowed to deduct is only of the value of Rs.60,000. The plaintiff undertakes duly to administer the property and credits of Radha Rukmini Ammal in any way concerning her Will by paying first her debts and then the legacies therein bequeathed so far as the assets will extend and make a full and true inventory thereof and exhibit the same in this Court within six months from the date of grant of letters administration with the Will annexed to the plaintiff and also to render to this Court a true account of the said pr
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top