SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 126

S.S.SUBRAMANI
Thulasi Ammal alias Parameswari – Appellant
Versus
S. Mahamuni (died) and others – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Sekar for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates, for Petitioner. R. Thamarai
Selvan, for Respondents.

Judgment :

These revisions are filed by the landlord under the following circumstances:

An application was filed by the tenant under Sec.4 of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Arrears of Rent (Relief) Act, 1990. An extent of 1 acre and 40 cents land in Survey No.72/1 of Kulithalai Taluk, admittedly belong to the petitioner. According to the tenant, for faslis 1396, 1397 and 1398, rent at the rate of Rs.980 is payable and he is entitled to the benefit of Sec.4 of the Tamil Nadu Cultivating Tenants Arrears of Rent (Relief) Act 1990. He further averred that the landlord has already filed a suit O.S.No.697 of 1989 on the file of District Munsifs Court, Kulithalai, against him and before the civil court he has deposited a sum of Rs.1,960 on 12. 1990 towards rent arrears and for the remaining year, taking into consideration the provisions of the Act, he need deposit only Rs.245. According to him, on payment of Rs.1,225, he must be discharged from paying any further amount to the landlord, for which the application was filed.

2. Landlord filed his objections and opposing the claim of the tenant. Evidence was adduced before the Revenue Court by both the parties and by order dated 110. 1992

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top