SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Mad) 558

A.RAMAN
T. M. Lakshmiah – Appellant
Versus
The Collector of Dharmapuri District & Another – Respondent


Advocates:
M.V. Krishnan, for Petitioner. C. Thirumaran, for Respondents.

Judgment :

1. Thepetitioner is the owner of the lands in S.Nos.58-1A, 58-1B, 58-2A1 in Thattanpalli Village, Hosur Taluk, Dharmapuri.

2. The petitioner was not served any notice with regard to acquisition. The petitioner came to understand that a notice was issued, purporting to be under Rule 5 of The Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition for Harijan Welfare Scheme Act, Act 31 of 1978. The mandatory requirement of notice before publication has not been complied with. The petitioner is a poor agriculturist, depending upon the land for his livelihood. There is a failure to comply with the procedure. On account of the same, a valuable right of the petitioner has been affected. The failure to follow the provisions is thoroughly bad in law. Therefore, the petitioner has come forward with this writ petition for issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ to call for the records relating to 4(1) Notification made in Na.Ka.No.55942/97 (K) issued under Tamil Nadu Act 31 of 1978, published in the Dharmapuri District Gazette, Extraordinary No.70, dated 111. 1997 relating to the petitioners land in S.Nos.58-1A, 58-1B, 58-2A1, measuring an extent of 0.98.5 hectares and situate in B Th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top