SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 177

P.SATHASIVAM
P. Tamilarasan – Appellant
Versus
State of T. N. and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
V. Sairam, Advocate, S. Gopinathan, Govt. Advocate.

Judgment :

The Order of the Court was as follows :

Aggrieved by the land acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents, the petitioner has filed the above writ petition.

.2. The case of the petitioner is as follows :

He purchased under Registered Sale Deed dated 31-12-1986 agricultural lands in Survey No. 332/1 from M/s. Subramaniam, Paramasivam and Kannan situated in Pernampet Village, Gudiattam Taluk, North Arcot District. Subsequent to the purchase of the said land he had effected change in all the Revenue Records and other authorities. He is in possession and enjoyment of the said lands right from the date of his purchase. While so, he received a notice from the third respondent herein dated 20-9-1991 inter alia stating that the award under the Land Acquisition Act has been wrongly given to his vendors and petitioner was directed to meet him to collect the amount which has been refunded by the vendors. It is further stated that only when he received the above-mentioned notice on 22-9-1991 he came to know that proceedings by the respondents under Land Acquisition Act. The entire proceedings have been initiated behind his back. Even though the lands under acquisition are u


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top