E.PADMANABHAN
H. H. Rijhwani – Appellant
Versus
N. Venkat Ramani and either others – Respondent
1. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for either side in both the revision petitions, the revision petitions are taken up today for final disposal and they are disposed of.
2. Heard Mr.K. Alagirisami senior counsel appearing for the petitioner in both the revision petitions, Mr.M. Venkatachalapathy, Senior Counsel appearing for the first respondent in C.R.P. No. 1077 of 1999, Mr.K.V. Venkatapathi, Advocate General appearing for the 1st respondent in C.R.P. No. 1078 of 1999 and Mr.M.S. Ramesh appearing for the 3rd respondent the Returning Officer. Service of notice on other respondents is not complete. However, it is represented jointly that the revision itself could be disposed of, as it arises out of an interlocutory order passed pending the suit.
3. C.R.P. No. 1077 of 1999 has been preferred against the order dated 23. 1999 made in I.A. No. 411 of 1999 in O.S. No. 493 of 1999 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Tiruchirapalli. In the said suit an injunction application has been instituted by the first respondent herein. In the suit, the plaintiff had prayed for the relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants especially the defendant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.