A.RAMAN
Rajakannu – Appellant
Versus
Sarojammal and seven others – Respondent
1. The plaintiff is the appellant herein.
2. The suit was filed by the plaintiff for declaration and permanent injunction. The property measuring 1.13 acres comprised in S. No. 229/3 and situate in the village of Senthurai, is the suit property. The 1st defendant is the wife of the 4th defendant. Defendants 2,3,8 and 9 are the children of the defendants 1 and 4 the 7th defendant is the 1st wife of the 4th defendant. Defendants 5 and 6 are the children of the 7th defendant born of the 4th defendant. The suit property belonged to the 4th defendant, who on 16. 1975, after receiving a consideration of Rs. 3,600 executed a sale in favour of the plaintiff. The sale was executed by the 4th defendant himself and as guardian of his minor children, defendants 8 and 9. As per the recitals in the sale deed, the promissory note executed by the 4th defendant on 6. 1974 was discharged. The plaintiff is a bona fide purchaser of the property for value. The defendants 1 to 3 filed a suit in O.S. No. 344 of 1975 for payment of maintenance and obtained a decree collusively. In execution of the said decree, the suit property was brought up for sale. The defendants 1 to 3 are disputing the r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.