SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 1147

K.SAMPATH
RAMESH – Appellant
Versus
KAMATHCHI ANIMAL – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties:A.K. Venkatesan, C. Ramesh, Advocates.

Judgment :

K. SAMPATH, J.

( 1 ) THE owner and the driver of a tractor with a trailer are the appellants in the civil miscellaneous appeal. Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are the legal representatives of one Kullagounder, who died in an accident involving the tractor and trailer belonging to the appellant no. 1 and driven by the appellant No. 2.

( 2 ) THE Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 55,000 as against a claim of rs. 1,00,000. It was alleged that the accident had occurred on account of rash and negligent driving of the tractor by the driver resulting in the deceased falling down from the vehicle and the front portion of the tractor running over him.

( 3 ) LEARNED counsel for the appellants points out that there are several discrepancies relating to how the accident happened and the Tribunal has not considered these discrepancies. According to the learned counsel, the Tribunal ought to have held that there was contributory negligence on the part of the deceased. Learned counsel further submitted that one of the heirs of the deceased has got married and settled down and had, therefore, ceased to be the dependent to be entitled to any compensation. One other submission made by the lea






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top