SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Mad) 2760

S.S.SUBRAMANI
V. Rajaram – Appellant
Versus
Periaswami Pillai – Respondent


Advocates:
M.V.Krishnan, for Petitioner. N.Damodaran, for Respondent.

Judgment :

Plaintiff in O.S.No.30 of 1996 on the file of District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Vedasandur is the revision petitioner. Suit filed by him was one for permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendant from interfering with his possession and for incidental reliefs.

2. Defendant in his written statement denied the title of plaintiff. Plaintiff therefore filed a petition for withdrawing the suit and to file a properly instituted suit. When permission was sought for the same was objected. Therefore an application for amending the plaint was filed as I.A.No.714 of 1998 to incorporate the relief of declaration of title.

3. Respondent again opposed the amendment mainly on the ground that if amendment is allowed, the suit will be beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of court below.

4. By the impugned order, lower court dismissed the amendment application only on the ground that if amendment is allowed the suit will be beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court. The said order is challenged in this revision petition.

5. Notice of motion was ordered and respondent also entered appearance.

6. After hearing counsel on both sides. I do not think that the order


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top