Plaintiff in O.S.No.84 of 1995, on the file of First Additional Sub Judge, Pondicherry, is the revision petitioner.

2. Plaintiff is aggrieved by the impugned order whereby the lower court has directed the plaintiff to value the suit under Sec.40(1) of the Pondicherry Court-fees and Suits Valuation Act, and also directed her to pay the deficit court-fee within 15 days from the date of order and amend the plaint accordingly.

The lower court further observed that if there was default in complying with that direction, the suit will be dismissed.

3. The material averments which are necessary for the purpose of this revision may be summed up as follows:

The reliefs sought for in the suit are as hereunder:

“(1) declaring that the plaintiff’s surely for 1st defendant is not enforceable against her;

.(2) directing the defendant No. 1 to return the title deeds mentioned in the schedule hereunder to the plaintiff;

.(3) restraining the defendant No.3 from proceeding against the plaintiff for non-payment of licence fees by defendant No. 1;

.(4) directing the defendants to pay the cost of the suit; and

.(5) pass such further or other relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and p