1. C.R.P.No.3265 of 1996 is against the judgment dated 111. 1996 in C.M.A.No.100 of 1996 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli, modifying and confirming the order dated 19. 1996 in I.A.No. 691 of 1996 in O.S.No.499 of 1996, granting injunction restraining the petitioners from interfering with the operation of the bank accounts and carrying on the business of the partnership. Though, injunction was granted as prayed for by the trial Court, the injunction was modified by the lower appellate Court to the extent that the Managing Partner should convene the meeting of the partners once in a month and submit the accounts and giving opportunity to the petitioners to move the Court for appointment of a Receiver in case they were able to establish that there was necessity for doing so.

2. C.R.P.No.3266 of 1966 is against the very same common order dated 111. 1996 in C.M.A.No.101 of 1996 etc., on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Tiruchirappalli, confirming the order of the learned Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirappalli, dated 19. 1996 in I.A.No.693 of 1996 in O.S.No.505 of 1996, dismissing the application for appointment of a receiver to tak