SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 7

K.GNANAPRAKASAM
S. NARAYANASWAMY NAICKER – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR OF CHENGALPATTU – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties:V. Dhakasekar, Vittal V. Souli, Advocates.

Judgment :

K. GNANAPRAKASAM, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed this petition seeking for a direction to the respondents to refund the excess stamp fees and registration fees collected by the respondents from the petitioner for registering the sale deed.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the facts are as follows the petitioner filed a suit in O. S. No. 465 of 1975 on the file of District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram for specific performance of the contract of sale and got a decree and the appeal filed by the defendants in A. S No. 27 of 1979 before the Sub Court, Kancheepuram was also dismissed. Even thereafter the defendants have not executed the sale deed and thereupon the plaintiff filed Execution Petition and after complying with the legal formalities, the learned District Munsif, Kancheepuram executed the sale deed in favour of the petitioner. The sale consideration stipulation was Rs. 1,000/- and the sale deed was engrossed on a nonjudicial stamp paper to the value of Rs. 120/-i. e. , at 12% ad valorem as required under the Stamp Act. But, however, the Joint sub-Registrar directed the petitioner to pay higher stamp duty namely on the market value of the land at Rs. 14,000/-and demanded the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top