SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 232

K.SAMPATH
Peramayee – Appellant
Versus
Guruvayee and Others – Respondent


Advocates:
P. Rathinadurai, for Appellant. T.T. Murugamanickam, for Respondent No. 1.

Judgment :

The second defendant is the appellant. The first respondent filed suit O.S.No.791 of 1989 before the District Munsif’s Court, Erode, for partition and separate possession of her l/8th share in item 1 and l/4th share in item 2 of the suit properties on the following averments:

The third respondent and the first respondent were the daughters of the second respondent through once Kolandasami Gounder and the appellant was the daughter of Kolandasami Gounder through his first wife Vellayammal. Vellayammal died about 48 years prior to the suit and Kolandasami Gounder married the second respondent as his second wife. Under the original of Ex. A-1 dated 17. 1972 Kolandasami Gounder bought suit item 1 in the joint names of himself and the second respondent for Rs.2,400. The second respondent was entitled to one half share and in the balance one half, the first respondent, the third respondent and the appellant along with the second respondent would each be entitled to l/8th share. The suit second item was purchased under the original of Ex.A-2 on 25. 1958 by Kolandasami. Each of the parties would be entitled to 1/4th share in suit item 2. Kolandasami Gounder died in February, 1988




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top