K.GOVINDARAJAN
S. Namagiri Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Pravin Harilal Mehta, Proprietor, Mehta Agencies and Others – Respondent
The landlady aggrieved against the order rejecting her eviction petition filed against the tenants, has filed the above revisions.
2. The premises in question originally belonged to the husband of the landlady, and after his death, his sons and daughters inherited the same. The landlady filed the eviction petitions to evict the tenants on the ground that she requires the respective premises for demolition and reconstruction. In the petitions she has stated that the premises are very old and in a dilapidated condition. So she wants to demolish and reconstruct the same as multi-storeyed ones. According to her, the premises are in the verge of falling down. The said petitions were resisted by the respective tenants by filing respective counters in the respective cases: The main defence that was taken in the counters was that the requirement of the landlady is not true, genuine or bona fide. According to them, the premises are in good and habitable condition and well-maintained. The learned Rent Controller/District Munsif, Coimbatore, after considering the oral documentary evidence allowed the petitions. Aggrieved against the same, the tenants filed appeals before the appella
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.