SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 353

D.RAJU
Gnanasubramanian – Appellant
Versus
Subramaniaya Pillai and Others – Respondent


Judgment :

The above second appeal has been filed by the plaintiff in O.S.No.910 of 1980 on the file of the District Munsif’s Court, Villupuram, who succeeded before the learned trial judge but lost before the first appellate court in A.S.No.7 of 1983, where under the learned Subordinate Judge, Villupuram, chose to reverse the judgment and decree of the learned trial Judge.

2. The suit O.S.No.910 of 1980 came to be filed for partition and separate possession of the plaintiff’s 1/4th share of the suit property and 1/4th share rent from the date of the plaint. The case of the plaintiff is that the suit property belonged to one Jankirama Pillai and his sons, who are defendants 1 to 3, fourth defendant being the daughter and the fifth defendant the wife of Jankirama Pillai. First defendant sold his 1/4th share to the plaintiff under a registered sale deed dated 7. 1967, marked as Ex.A-2, and the father Jankirama Pillai is said to have died in the year 1973 leaving behind three sons, daughter and wife. Since the plaintiff wanted his share divided by metes and bounds and defendants 1 and 3, though, initially were offering to sell, later, did not pursue the same, the plaintiff was driven t


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top