S.S.SUBRAMANI
C. R. Subramaniam – Appellant
Versus
N. Vasudevan – Respondent
.1. Tenant in R.C.OLP. No.8 of 1989, on the file of Rent Controller (District Munsif), Erode, is the revision petitioner.
2. Respondent, landlord of the building, filed the petition for eviction on the ground that he needs the schedule premises for his own occupation. In his eviction petition, it is said that he is carrying on wholesale and retail business in hardware and paints under the name and style Karpal Steel Agencies as sole proprietor in a rented premises at Door No. 134, Valayalkara Street, Erode Town from 1963. It is also said that he was also having a godown for storing articles in another rented premises in Door No. 136 in the same Street. His landlord, Yusuf, filed a petition for eviction, and the same was ordered. It is further said that the petitioner (landlord) vacated the rented godown and shifted it to No.7, Chokkanatha Gounder Street, Fort, Erode-1. It is said that the landlord of door No. 134 were harassing the petitioner to vacate the rented premises, and number of petitions were filed against him. They filed R.C.O.P. No. 93 of 1979 in the District Munsif s Court, Erode, and the same was allowed. Petitioner (N. Vasudevan) filed C.M.A. No.19 of 198
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.