SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 275

S.S.SUBRAMANI
TODHUNTER NAGAR RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
S. SELLAPPAN – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties:G. Raju, R. Subramaniam, Advocates.

Judgment :-

S.S. SUBRAMANI, J.

( 1 ) -THIS revision is filed by a third party to a suit, who feels aggrieved by a decree of the lower court.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts which compelled the petitioner to come up to this court under article 227 of the Constitution of India, may be summarised thus : petitioner is an Association formed for the welfare of the residents of Todhunter nagar, Chennai, and the same was registered under the Societies Registration Act. As per the Byelaws of the Society, election is to be held every year for which nomination is to be called for, and after appointing Election Officers, and if election is necessitated, the voting will be by secret ballot. Third respondent in this revision is the elected Secretary of the association, and it is said that the election was not being 9onducted for years together and consequently disputes arose between the members of the Association. In order to settle the disputes, taking into consideration the welfare of the Association, a general body meeting was held on 27. 1. 1996, to elect the office-bearers as per Byelaws.

( 3 ) A general body meeting was held on 27. 1. 1996 only to consider the conditions for the election and also













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top