A.RAMAN
Lingammal and 7 Others – Appellant
Versus
Periappappa alias Lingammal and Another – Respondent
This revision is directed against the order passed by the District Munsif, Krishnagiri in I.A.No.628 of 1994 in I.A.No.524 of 1992 in O.S.No. 190 of 1981 on 11. 1994. The respondents herein filed an application before the lower court praying for amendment of the plaint, final decree application and preliminary decree. The petitioners case is that there is some clerical error in the description of property. Therefore, it has to be suitably amended. This application was opposed by the petitioners herein and overruling the objections, the petition was ordered as prayed for.
2. The point for determination is: whether the order passed by the lower court is liable to be set aside?
3.Point: The suit was filed for partition in the year 1981. The preliminary decree was passed on 112. 1985. An appeal was preferred against the said preliminary decree in A.S.No.9 of 1988. The appellate court modified the decree of the trial court by its judgment dated 22. 1990. An application was filed by the plaintiffs viz., the respondents herein for passing of a final decree in I.A.No.524 of 1992. While the said application was pending, on 24. 1994 the petitioners have come up with the present app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.