SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 921

N.V.BALASUBRAMANIAN, SHIVARAJ PATIL
JAYAKODI JACOB D. – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT – Respondent


For the Appearing Parties:S.N. Ravichandran, S. Ravindran, T.S. Gopalan, Advocates.

Judgment :

( 1 ) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) THE unsuccessful writ petition challenging the validity and correctness of the Award dated January 12, 1994 made by the first respondent Labour Court in I. D. No. 438 of 1992, has filed this writ appeal challenging the order dated September 1, 1995 made by the learned single Judge in W. P. No. 7841 of 1995. 2-A. The facts briefly stated which are relevant and necessary for the disposal of this writ appeal, are the following :-The appellant was working as a Clerical Assistant in the employment of the respondent No. 2. Respondent No. 2 introduced the Voluntary Retirement Scheme (V. R. S.) from the First Appeal 1987 under which Clerical Assistants could opt for voluntary retirement from service receiving certain monetary compensation and benefits. The appellant gave a letter opting voluntary retirement on March 31, 1987 (according to the respondent No. 2 Management, application for voluntary retirement was given in February, 1987 ). The appellant submitted a letter on April 1, 1987 withdrawing the letter dated March 31, 1987 giving option for voluntary retirement. Thereafter, the appellant wrote one more latter on April





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top