.1. This Revision is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the notice issued by 1st respondent — Bar Council of Tamil Nadu, to the petitioner under Rule 5in Chapter — 1part VII read with Sec 35/36 of Advocates Act, 1961.

.2. Relevant facts which resulted in issuance of the said notice may be submmarised thus:-

Late S.S. Mari Chettiar had six sons, and there was an interse dispute between them. They even thought of initiating legal proceedings by going to Court. At that time, some well wishers of the family suggested that it is a matter which has to be settled out of Court, and advocate Mr. Sarangan, Bangalore was appointed as Arbitrator. Petitioner herein, who is also an advocate, was closely connected with the family, both in view of his relation-ship and also in view of his appointment as Legal Advisor in various Companies run by the family. Petitioner, in view of his intimate connection with the family (not as an advocate) was also asked to co-ordinate with the Arbitrator, It is said that at the instance of the Arbitrator, a settlement deed was executed containing 17 pages with 26 clauses, and the same was prepared on 17. 1993. The document was