SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Mad) 1750

A.RAMAMURTHI
A. Raja – Appellant
Versus
Ingnasi – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Velusami, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr.P. Subramanian, Advocate for Respondent.

Judgment :

1. The unsuccessful tenant has preferred the revision aggrieved against the order of eviction passed by the Rent Control Appellate Authority Madurai inR.C.A. No. 127of 1992.

2. The respondent/landlord filed a petition for eviction against the tenant on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent and also for own use and occupation. The tenant was in arrears from September, 1982. When the landlord intended to sell the building in question, the tenant never allowed him to do so and the demised property is required for his own use and occupation as he has no other building. The tenant, however, resisted the application for eviction and contended that he has paid the rent regularly upto May, 1984 and he had also entered into an agreement of sale with the landlord on June, 1984. Ever since June, 1984. there is no jural relationship of landlord and tenant and, as such, the present application is not maintainable under law. The request of own use and occupation is also not true. There is absolutely no arrears of rent on and from June, 1984 since he is occupying the property in part performance of the agreement of sale. The landlord agreed to convey the property for a sum o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top