K.GOVINDARAJAN
A. S. Mahaboob Huss – Appellant
Versus
Jayaraman and six others – Respondent
1. The petitioner filed a petition under section 10 (2)(1) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, in M.R.C.O.P. No. 118 of 1981 on the file of the Rent Controller, Trichy to evict the respondents/tenants on the ground that the respondents have not paid the rent for 37 months from 2. 1978.
2. The non payment of rent is not disputed by the tenants. According to the tenants, they sought to send the rent by money order, which was refused and the tenants paid the property tax to the Municipality with respect to the property in question. In view of the above fact, the tenants case is that the non payment of the rent cannot be construed as wilful. It is also not disputed that the petitioner issued a notice dated 3. 78 to the respondents.
3. The Rent Controller in his order dated 30.10.1987 found that the tenants have defaulted the payment of rent which amounts to wilful default and on the basis of the aforesaid fact, ordered eviction. Aggrieved against the same, the tenants filed an appeal
R.C.A. No.1 of 1988. The Appellate Authority accepting the case of the tenants found that the tenants have not committed wilful default in payment of rent. Aggrieved agai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.