K.GOVINDARAJAN
Poorman’s Depot Registration firm by its President, Rathinasabapathi – Appellant
Versus
P. R. M. A. Krishnan – Respondent
The above revision petition is filed by the tenant who failed before both the authorities below.
.2. The respondent/ landlord filed a petition in R.C.O.P. No.8 of 1988 on the file of the Rent Controller (Additional District Munsif, Tuticorin) on the ground of wilful default in payment of rent. He requires the building for his own occupation to start his commission business. It is the case of the respondent that he is the owner of the premises in question and the petitioner is a tenant under the respondent occupying the premises on a monthly rent of Rs.200 per month. In R.C.O.P. No.l16 of 1984 filed by the petitioner herein before the Rent Controller, Tuticorin, the Rent Controller has order the petitioner herein to deposit the rent into court continuously without fail. It is the further case of the respondent herein that in spite of the court orders, the tenant has not deposited the rent into court from July, 1987 onwards till date of the petition, namely, November, 1987. It is his further case that the landlord requires the premises to do his business as partner with his son Adhimuthu. On the basis of these averments, the landlord filed the petition to vacate the tenant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.